HOFER LAW FILES OPEN RECORDS COMPLAINT AGAINST LOCAL SMALL CLAIMS COURT

Today I filed  an official Access to Public Records Act complaint against the Wayne Township Small Claims Court in Indianapolis. I don’t do this lightly. Twenty years ago, I filed a complaint against a judge who was letting collection lawyer run the court, and although the judge was reprimanded, I was effectively blacklisted from all the Small Claims Courts.  I filed the complaint because I intend to continue to investigate patterns of filing collection cases in the small claims courts, and I can’t afford to go to each court twice, once just to get turned down and the second time to get the information after convincing the court staff that the open records act applies.   My complaint is below.

————————————————————————————————————
Consumer Law Office of Steve Hofer

3750 Guion Road, Suite 190

Indianapolis IN 46222

317-662-4LAW                                                                                                                  www.hoferlawindy.com

317-662-4529                                                                                               hoferlawindy@gmail.com


August 21, 2014                                                Via Mail and Fax 317-233-3091


Luke Britt

Indiana Public Access Counselor

W470 Indiana Government Center South

402 West Washington Street

Indianapolis IN 46204


OFFICIAL OPEN RECORDS COMPLAINT

                                Agency: Wayne Township (Marion County) Small Claims Court

                5401 West Washington Street, Indianapolis IN 46241

                                Date of Request/Agency Denied Access: August 4, 2014


Dear Counselor Britt:


I am hereby making a complaint of denied access under the Indiana Access to Public Records Act.  The agency in question is the Wayne Township Small Claims Court in Indianapolis.  On Monday, August 4, 2014, during regular business hours, between 2:30 and 3:00 PM; I went to the Wayne Township Small Claims Court for the purposes of reviewing a selection of recent cases filed by bad debt buyers.  The abuse of the court system by bad debt buyers is a matter of public concern.  For context see: The One Hundred Billion Dollar Problem in Small Claims Court: Robo-Signing and Lack of Proof, Peter A. Holland, published in Journal of Business & Technology Law, Vol. 6, p. 259, 2011 and online at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1875727. See also the New York Times Magazine feature story Paper Boys: Inside the Dark, Labyrinth, and Extremely Lucrative World of Consumer  Debt Collection,  Jake Halpern, http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2014/08/15/magazine/bad-paper-debt-collector.html?_r=0


At the Wayne Township Court, I was allowed to use the public access terminal to identify a selection of recent cases. I copied down some case numbers, approximately 20, and asked to see the files that went with the case numbers.  The attendant said that I was not allowed to see the files, that they were not public. The only public information was the information on the terminal. I told the attendant that she is mistaken, these are public records that are readily accessed by collection attorneys on a daily basis.  On that same day I had inspected files without incident at Pike Township Small Claims Court. The attendant told me that I would have to take it up with the supervisor who was not in, and would not be available until tomorrow. She would not give me the full name of the supervisor. I offered to make a written request, but I was rebuffed. 


I believe it is the responsibility of the agency to have persons trained in compliance with the act on duty during all regular business hours regardless of the presence or absence of any given supervisor.  I believe my treatment at this court conveys an image that the court’s policy is to be friendly to debt collectors but not to persons who want to police the conduct of debt collectors.


Finally, I would have made an informal request for an opinion by the counselor if it were not for a disturbing fact that I found out later.  In the MYCASE online record system, the defendants’ names are missing from the online records of a number of collection cases filed in Wayne and Lawrence Townships after 8/11/2014.   (See enclosed documentation.) If researchers aren’t even able to get defendant names from the online system; it will be impossible to uncover problems with debt collectors misusing the court system[1].


Sincerely,




Steven R. Hofer

Attorney at Law


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The MYCASE documents that I attached included lawsuits filed by:

Credit Acceptance Corporation
LVNV Funding LLC
Convergence Receivables LC
Calvary SPV 1 LLC
MSW Capital LLC
Second Round LP
Credit Acceptance Corporation
NCEP, LLC
Jefferson Capital Systems, LLC
























Enclosures – Mycase records




[1] The Mycase sheets are included for illustration only. Because for this purpose the names of the defendants are irrelevant, I have partially redacted those that are included.  

Co

Steve Hofer

Share
Published by
Steve Hofer

Recent Posts

Keith Hagan featured on RTV6 expose about Dead Debt Collectors

Journalist Kara Kenney and RTV6 reported today on the nationwide class action filed by Hagan…

1 year ago

Prisoner’s Dilemma and Debt Negotiation

 I love having a partner (Keith Hagan) who an expert in game theory.  We have…

2 years ago

Hyundai is jumping the shark over its response to the auto theft scandal

 Hyundai has been under intensive heat after youtube posts showed how easy it is to…

2 years ago