We are in the early stage of working up a number of  Pink Energy solar panel installation cases.  The deeper I get into it, the more that I see that it is a major project involving a lot of challenges.  I can see why a lot of lawyers want nothing to do with these cases. The company that created the mess, Pink Energy, is bankrupt. The potential clients didn’t pay a lot up front, probably don’t have a lot of money to spend on a lawyer, but are on the hook for a big loan to a mean old finance company.  The actual subject matter of the contracts is very technical and complex. Just figuring out, explaining and proving the defects is challenging.  

What we have going for us that a lot of lawyers don’t is experience in using the FTC Holder Rule against lenders in consumer cases.  Pursuing claims against these lenders could yield very good results and has the potential to protect the clients against having to pay for nonfunctional systems for years to come.  

By the way, here’s a good story from CBS4 about the problems of Pink Energy customers in Indiana. 


https://cbs4indy.com/cbs4-investigates/dozens-of-customers-heated-after-installing-solar-panels/


doublehlaw

Share
Published by
doublehlaw

Recent Posts

Keith Hagan featured on RTV6 expose about Dead Debt Collectors

Journalist Kara Kenney and RTV6 reported today on the nationwide class action filed by Hagan…

1 year ago

Prisoner’s Dilemma and Debt Negotiation

 I love having a partner (Keith Hagan) who an expert in game theory.  We have…

2 years ago

Hyundai is jumping the shark over its response to the auto theft scandal

 Hyundai has been under intensive heat after youtube posts showed how easy it is to…

2 years ago